Cover Image

Inferior vena cava filters in the management of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: a systematic review

Rachna Raman, Philip D. Leming, Manish Bhandari, Daniel Long, Michael B. Streiff
  • Rachna Raman
    Department of Internal Medicine, The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, United States | ramanrachna@gmail.com
  • Philip D. Leming
    Department of Hematology/Oncology, The Christ Hospital, Cinncinati, United States
  • Manish Bhandari
    Department of Hematology/Oncology, The Christ Hospital, Cinncinati, United States
  • Daniel Long
    Department of Radiology, The Christ Hospital, Cinncinati, United States
  • Michael B. Streiff
    Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, United States

Abstract

This study systematically reviews outcomes after inferior vena cava (IVC) filtration in cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). A comprehensive review of the English language literature was performed using MEDLINE, COCHRANE library, Embase and CINAHL on outcomes (i.e., pulmonary embolism, recurrent DVT, postphlebitic syndrome and survival) following IVC filtration in cancer-associated VTE. Fourteen studies with 2,154 cancer patients receiving IVC filters post-VTE were included. All were observational studies. The mean duration of followup was 0.7–38 months and mean patient age was 56.8– 68 years. Among study participants, 47–87% had stage 3 or 4 cancers. Of the 47–93% of filters inserted for contraindications to anticoagulation (AC), 10–33% were placed for relative contraindications. Recurrent PE was seen in 0–6%, fatal PE in 0–4.5%, recurrent DVT in 0–18.2%, postphlebitic syndrome (PPS) in 0–2.7%, and IVC thrombosis (ICVT) in 3% of cancer patients. Median survival post-filter insertion was 2–10 months. Evidence supporting the utility of IVC filter insertion in cancer-associated VTE is limited to observational studies only. Preliminary data demonstrate similar safety and efficacy of filters in cancer and noncancer populations. The combination of filters and anticoagulation is no more effective than either modality alone. Retrievable filters are an attractive option for prevention of VTE in the presence of temporary risk factors or temporary contraindications to anticoagulation in patients who have a reasonable life expectancy, but there is no evidence to support their preferential use in patients with advanced malignancy.

Keywords

IVC filter - Cancer - Review - Thromboembolism

Full Text:

FULL TEXT
Submitted: 2011-12-05 14:33:02
Published: 2011-12-05 00:00:00
Search for citations in Google Scholar
Related articles: Google Scholar
Abstract views:
1041

Views:
FULL TEXT
202

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


Copyright (c) 2011 Rachna Raman, Philip D. Leming, Manish Bhandari, Daniel Long, Michael B. Streiff

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
 
© PAGEPress 2008-2018     -     PAGEPress is a registered trademark property of PAGEPress srl, Italy.     -     VAT: IT02125780185