Axillary dissection compared to sentinel node biopsy for the treatment of pathologically node-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis of four randomized trials with long-term follow up

Main Article Content

Fausto Petrelli *
Veronica Lonati
Sandro Barni
(*) Corresponding Author:
Fausto Petrelli | faupe@libero.it

Abstract

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is now accepted as the initial approach for women with early stage breast cancer with clinically node-negative disease. We performed a pooled analysis of trials comparing axillary lymph node dissection to sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with early stage breast cancer and pathologically negative sentinel lymph node analysis. A systematic MEDLINE review identified four randomized trials of axillary dissection versus sentinel lymph node biopsy in lymph node-negative early stage breast cancer patients. A meta-analysis was performed for survival and relapse. The combined analyses of these four trials found no significant difference in overall survival (relative risk [RR] 1.15; P=0.16; 95% CI: 0.95-1.39), breast cancer-specific (RR 1.03; P=0.85; 95% CI: 0.75- 1.43) and disease-free survival (RR 1.07; P=0.3; 95% CI: 0.94-1.21), distant metastases (RR 1; P=0.98; 95% CI: 0.76-1.32), and ipsilateral breast recurrence (RR 1.64; P=0.34; 95% CI: 0.60-4.47) associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy. In particular, a similar rate of nodal recurrences was seen after sentinel lymph node biopsy (RR 1.74; P=0.13; 95% CI: 0.86- 3.53). Axillary dissection does not confer a survival benefit nor prevent further nodal relapses in the setting of early stage, pathologically lymph node-negative breast cancer.

Downloads month by month

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Author Biographies

Fausto Petrelli, Azienda Ospedaliera di Treviglio

Veronica Lonati, Azienda Ospedaliera di Treviglio

Sandro Barni, Azienda Ospedaliera di Treviglio